Though often overshadowed by Dubai, the capital of the United Arab Emirates perhaps offers a better overall travel experience than the federation's largest city. Traditional architectural styles and sustainability principles have informed new development. The city has thus retained a stronger sense of place than its more over-the-top neighbor, and the surrounding desert has sustained less ecological damage in the wake of the country's recent building boom. A lower carbon footprint would have resulted in an even higher score.
Here is a representative sampling of additional anonymous comments from the panelists. They are not necessarily the views of the National Geographic Society:
"A fantastic city with a different and powerful development approach, from the sustainable Masdar City to the island of Saadiyat. Lots of museums designed by world-famous architects."
"Abu Dhabi is a real place, in contrast to Dubai. Visiting it provides insight into contemporary UAE culture."
"Fairly low-key tourism developments, well planned and generally exclusive, based on large hotel chains. Appeals to the wealthy. Well-designed, expensive resorts that sometimes reflect Bedouin traditions (but these are often a pastiche). They cater mostly to Western tastes and rarely employ local residents."
"In comparison to Dubai, Abu Dhabi is taking a conservative and measured approach to development."
2016 National Geographic Travel Photographer of the Year Contest
Show us your best photos of nature, cities, and people from your travels around the world.